Tags: Research / Graduate School / Networking
Introduction
Physics is a fundamental science that has contributed immensely to the development of modern society. From the discovery of electricity to the invention of the internet, physics has played a critical role in shaping our world. However, despite its importance, physicists are underrepresented in politics. According to The New York Times, there are only about 30 scientists among the 535 senators and representatives in the 110th Congress. This lack of representation is concerning, as physics PhDs have the potential to make a significant impact on public policy. In this article, we will explore the power of physics PhDs in shaping public policy and the barriers they face in getting involved in politics.
The Current State of Physics Representation in Politics
Although there are only a few physicists in Congress, physics is on a roll with three physicists in Congress, according to The New York Times ↗. These physicists have formed a caucus of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) professionals in Congress. They believe that their scientific background gives them a unique perspective in policymaking. However, they have faced challenges in transitioning from the lab to the legislature. They still maintain an interest in physics and occasionally think about returning to full-time research.
The physics caucus argues that a Congress full of physicists might solve worrisome problems. Many representatives lack knowledge of science and technological components of issues. Physicists advise the next administration to appoint a science adviser and keep that person in the presidential inner circle. A science adviser should remind the next administration what science can and cannot do. The need for a science advisor in the presidential inner circle is crucial, as it would ensure that science is considered in policy decisions.
Overcoming Barriers to Political Involvement for Physicists
There are barriers to drawing more scientists into politics, as many researchers view politics as dirty, according to The New York Times. However, it is essential to overcome this perception, as physicists have much to offer in policymaking. The capacity to take the long view is crucial in policymaking, and physicists argue that what is needed is not more advanced degrees, but this capacity. The versatility of physicists in adapting to the real world of politics is also important.
The lack of representation of physicists in politics is concerning, as it means that important issues like climate change, environmental pollution, and cancer are not being adequately addressed. The perception of politics as dirty is a significant barrier to political involvement for physicists. However, it is crucial to overcome this perception, as physicists have much to offer in policymaking. The capacity to take the long view is crucial in policymaking, and physicists argue that what is needed is not more advanced degrees, but this capacity. The versatility of physicists in adapting to the real world of politics is also important.
The Role of Scientists in Politics
Scientists offer a unique perspective in politics and can advocate for science funding and evidence-based decision making. According to SitN, some scientists have felt the call to campaign for public office since the 2016 presidential election. A political action committee called 314 Action has been established to fund and support scientists running for office. This initiative is crucial, as scientists are not currently involved in policy considerations and debates at all levels of government.
It is crucial for scientists to represent the public at every level of government. Lack of interest from scientists in politics has created a gap in decision-making on important issues like cancer, Alzheimer's, climate change, and environmental pollution. According to SitN, promoting scientific literacy can help scrutinize the differences between ideology and hard scientific fact ↗ ↗. Citizen science initiatives can encourage greater public participation in scientific discovery.
Promoting Scientific Literacy and Citizen Science
Effective communication of scientific findings to the general public is crucial. Scientists often struggle to effectively communicate their findings to the general public, leading to confusion over scientific facts and findings, according to SitN. Scientists are often inaccurately portrayed in media as eccentric or mad. Promoting scientific literacy can help scrutinize the differences between ideology and hard scientific fact.
Citizen science initiatives can encourage greater public participation in scientific discovery. According to SitN, political willpower is necessary for funding vital research, and an informed citizenry is necessary for creating political willpower. Creating a bureau for scientific literacy or using citizen science as qualifications for scientific vocational competence can make science more accessible to the public overall.
Conclusion
In conclusion, physics PhDs have the potential to make a significant impact on public policy. However, physicists are underrepresented in politics, and there are barriers to drawing more scientists into politics. The perception of politics as dirty is a significant barrier to political involvement for physicists. It is crucial to overcome this perception, as physicists have much to offer in policymaking. Scientists offer a unique perspective in politics and can advocate for science funding and evidence-based decision making. Promoting scientific literacy and citizen science is crucial in ensuring that science is considered in policy decisions. By increasing representation of scientists in politics, we can ensure that important issues like climate change, environmental pollution, and cancer are adequately addressed.
References
